Nano-Regulation, towards a sustainable regulatory framework for nanotechnologies

During the spri ng 2005 an international forum was started in Switerzerland, comprising of stakeholders from industry, insurance, research, retail, government and NGO organisations with the goal to:

• establish an international multi-stakeholder network on regulatory issues
• characterise stakeholders attitudes and expectations towards safety and risk issues
• address safety, risk and regulation needs of nanotechnology from different perspectives
• facilitate proactive solution oriented dialogue processes on safety and risk issues
• identify and prioritise the fields of action
• propose forthcoming activities

The Innovation Society has completed a DELPHI-study looking at the regulation needs of nanotechnology, involving the various stakeholders. Its findings and recommedndations were recently published during March 2006.

".....Based on the key-results of the performed activities it can be stated that a dialogue forum about safety and risk-issues is broadly welcomed as a powerful and efficient instrument of information, coordination and cooperation1. A dialogue on regulatory issues was judged to be valuable in terms of an increased security of action for all stakeholders. The importance of early engagement of the public in order to prevent a sudden backlash in terms of lacking trust was stressed to be important by all parties.

Due to the fast technological development, the fast increase in products, containing nano-components and the rapid and broad application of nanoparticles and nanomaterials in manufacturing processes, there is an urgent need to clarify safety issues of nanotechnology and to identify gaps in either occupational health safety, product and consumer safety or environmental regulations.

There was also a common understanding that most countries of Western Europe (incl. Switzerland) should develop or adopt internationally compatible frameworks or standards. In order to overcome trading barriers an EU-wide or even global harmonisation of frameworks and standards would be appropriate. The question on which specific properties of nano substance (diameter, toxicity, surface characteristics, scope or exposition) the regulation should look at, remained open. However a thoughtful case-by-case risk analysis is required with potentially hazardous nanomaterials and a proactive risk-management system has to be established...."

Ten recommendations have been made including establishing clear terminalogy, moving from risk-assessment to proactive risk management and greater communication and public dialogue.

Read the report ... click here

Shak Gohir